[dcs_img_center desc=”Photo Credit: David Thorson, TracerX Photography”
framed=”black” w=”600″ h=”399″]
http://www.gunsandtactics.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/TRX__1676A.jpg
[/dcs_img_center]

[dcs_post_top]

Shop Rainierarms.com Today!

[dcs_fancy_header bgcolor=”#ffffff” color=”#000000″ fweight=”bold”]Obama’s Anti-Gun Rights Proposals After Sandy Hook Would Not Have Stopped The Charleston Mass Shooting.[/dcs_fancy_header]

[dcs_thinspliter size=”medium”]

National Review’s Charles C.W. Cooke wrote a column explaining how President Obama’s anti-second amendment proposals after the Sandy Hook massacre would not have stopped the Charleston massacre.

[dcs_rounded_box padding=”15px” margin=”24px 0px 0px 0px”]

None of Obama’s Own Gun Control Proposals Have Anything to Do with the Shootings in Charleston

It didn’t take too long until we heard the oh-so-predictable calls for more gun control. Speaking this morning during an emotional press conference, the Mayor of Charleston, Joseph P. Riley, expressed his disappointment that the massacre at Sandy Hook had not yielded a "major national effort" to restrict the right to keep and bear arms. Later, he signaled his intention to "push on" toward that goal. He was quickly joined by the President of the United States, who used his remarks as an opportunity to propose that Something Needed to Be Done:

Giving voice to intense heartache, anger and sadness, President Barack Obama said Thursday the South Carolina church shooting that left nine people dead shows the need for a national reckoning on gun violence.

Obama, who knew the pastor killed in the Charleston attack, said he has been called upon too often to mourn the deaths of innocents killed by those "who had no trouble getting their hands on a gun."

"Now is the time for mourning and for healing," the president said. "But let’s be clear. At some point, we as a country will have to reckon with the fact that this type of mass violence does not happen in other advanced countries. It doesn’t happen in other places with this kind of frequency. And it is in our power to do something about it."

The million dollar question, though, is, "Do what?" It is all very well to criticize the National Rifle Association and the Republican party for opposing further gun control, and yet it remains an inconvenient truth that not one of the reforms that the Democratic party proposed the last time it ventured into this debate would have changed the outcome here.

[/dcs_rounded_box]

After Sandy Hook, the President and his anti-gun sycophants proposed three measures to control your second amendment rights:

[dcs_rounded_box padding=”15px” margin=”24px 0px 0px 0px”]

Back in 2013, when the country was still reeling from the abomination at Sandy Hook, President Obama hoped to achieve three things: 1) He hoped to ban so-called "assault weapons"; 2) he hoped to limit the size of commercially available magazines; and 3) he hoped to force all the states to require background checks when a firearm is privately transferred.

[/dcs_rounded_box]

So, would any of the three measures stopped Charleston? Nope.

[dcs_rounded_box padding=”15px” margin=”24px 0px 0px 0px”]

Because the killer used a pistol with a regular magazine, the first two of these proposals are irrelevant here. Per Reuters, the shooter’s "father gave him a .45-caliber pistol for his birthday this year." That pistol would not have fallen under any of the "assault weapons" bans that were proposed by Obama and his allies in Congress. Moreover, magazine capacity does not seem to have been an issue. The New York Times reports that the shooter took his time, stopping to talk and "[reloading] five times." Had he been limited by law to ten rounds per magazine — as Dianne Feinstein would have liked — he would have been in no worse a position. (Most .45s come with magazines that hold seven, eight, or nine rounds.)

As for the third: Even if we presume that the problem was that the killer wasn’t picked up by the system (it wasn’t), Obama’s much-vaunted "universal background check" proposal would not have applied here, either. "Toomey-Manchin," the failed bill that contained the measure, explicitly exempted all transfers between family members and close friends — not, you will note, because it contained a "loophole" or a "typo" or an "oversight," but because such exemptions were deemed to be "common sense." I’m sorry to be a killjoy, but the truth is the truth: Had the Democratic laundry list of 2013 been implemented in its entirety, what happened this morning would have gone down in exactly the same way.

[/dcs_rounded_box]

Full Article

[dcs_thinspliter size=”medium”]

[dcs_img_center desc=”Photo Credit: David Thorson, TracerX Photography”
framed=”black” w=”600″ h=”399″]
http://www.gunsandtactics.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/TRX__1073.jpg
[/dcs_img_center]

[dcs_thinspliter size=”medium”]

* The views and opinions expressed on this web site are solely those of the original authors and contributors. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of Guns & Tactics Magazine,
the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

[dcs_rounded_box padding=”15px” margin=”24px 0px 0px 0px”]
Want more posts like this one? Subscribe to Guns & Tactics Magazine to receive email updates and special offers direct to your inbox!
[/dcs_rounded_box]

[dcs_post_bottom]
[dcs_post_author]
[dcs_related_posts]
[dcs_thinspliter size=”medium”]

Jerry has been a criminal justice professional for nearly two decades. He is a self-proclaimed Second Amendment scholar, gun rights advocate, and NRA Life Member.